The Website address is:  http://gomex.erma.noaa.gov/erma.html#x=-90.42000&y=28.03000&z=6&layers=4360+4366+4382+497+3434

The Website is provided through the combined efforts of  The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the University of New Hampshire.

• • Google Hybrid
  • Google Terrain
  • Google Roads
  • Google Satellite

• Response Planning

  • LA LOSCO Marina Locations (2004)
  • Sector New Orleans Staging Areas
  • Sector New Orleans Marinas
  • Sector Mobile AOR 2006
  • Sector Mobile Operational Areas
  • Sector Mobile Oil Spill Sensitive Areas
  • Sector Mobile Staging Areas
  • Sector Mobile GRP Index
  • Sector St Pete Oil Spill Sensitive Areas
  • Sector St Pete Staging Areas
  • Sector St Pete Tidal Inlet Boom
  • Sector St Pete Boat Ramps
  • Sector St Pete Marinas
  • Sector St Pete GRP Index
  • Sector Key West Oil Spill Sensitive Areas
  • Sector Key West Staging Areas
  • Sector Key West Marinas
  • Sector Key West Boat Ramps
  • Sector Key West GRP Index

  clear

• BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

  • Wellhead Surface Location
  • Command Posts
  • BP Claim Centers
  • BP Community Outreach Centers

  • Estimated Spill Trajectory

    • Nearshore Estimated Spill Trajectory

      • Nearshore Trajectory Estimate for 22-June-10 at 1200 CDT
      • Nearshore Trajectory Estimate for 23-June-10 at 1200 CDT
      • Nearshore Trajectory Estimate for 24-June-10 at 1200 CDT

      clear

    • Offshore Trajectories

      • Offshore Trajectory Estimate for 22-June-10 at 1200 CDT
      • Offshore Trajectory Estimate for 23-June-10 at 1200 CDT
      • Offshore Trajectory Estimate for 24-June-10 at 1200 CDT

      clear

    clear

  • Shoreline Cleanup Assessment Technique (SCAT)

    • Louisiana

      • Latest Observed 06-20-2010
      • Latest Observed 06-19-10

      clear

    • Sector Mobile

      • Latest Observed 06-20-2010

      clear

    clear

  • Satellite, Radar, and Aerial Images of the Spill

    • Radar Images [Potential Oiling Footprint - NOAA/NESDIS]

      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 21 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 21 June 2010 1826 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 21 June 2010 1113 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 20 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 20 June 2010 1857 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 20 June 2010 1840 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 20 June 2010 0652 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 20 June 2010 0644 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 19 June 2010 1838 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 19 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 19 June 2010 1824 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 19 June 2010 1356 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 18 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 18 June 2010, 2241 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 18 June 2010, 1854 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 18 June 2010, 1225 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 17 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 17 June 2010, 1938 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 17 June 2010 1200 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 17 June 2010 1000 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 16 June 2010 2045 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 16 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 16 June 2010 1030CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 16 June 2010 1055 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 16 June 2010 0800CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 15 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 15 June 2010 1200 CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 15 June 2010 2115CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 13 June 2010 Composite
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 15 June 2010 0825CDT
      • NESDIS Anomaly Analysis 14 June 2010 1230CDT

      clear

    • High Resolution Satellite Images [NASA MODIS]

      • MODIS AQUA 06/17/10
      • MODIS TERRA 06/17/10
      • MODIS AQUA 06/16/10
      • MODIS TERRA 06/16/10
      • MODIS AQUA 06/15/10
      • MODIS TERRA 06/15/10
      • MODIS AQUA 06/14/10
      • MODIS TERRA 06/14/10
      • MODIS AQUA 06/13/10
      • MODIS TERRA 06/13/10

      clear

    • Mosaic Aerial Images [NOAA @ Telascience]

      • All Dates Mosaic (Telascience)
      • 2010-06-07 (Telascience)
      • 2010-06-06 (Telascience)
      • 2010-06-02 (Telascience)
      • 2010-06-01 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-31 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-29 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-25 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-23 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-22 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-20 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-15 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-18 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-13 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-12 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-09 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-08 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-07 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-06 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-05 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-04 (Telascience)

      clear

    • Mosaic Aerial Images [NASA @ Telascience]

      • All Dates Mosaic (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-20 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-19 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-18 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-17 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-11 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-13 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-06 (Telascience)

      clear

    • Aerial EPA Aspect – Hosted by Telascience

      • All Dates Mosaic (Telascience)
      • 2010-06-04 (Telascience)
      • 2010-06-02 (Telascience)
      • 2010-06-01 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-31 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-30 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-29 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-28 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-27 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-26 (Telascience)
      • 2010-05-25 (Telascience)

      clear

    clear

  • Sampling

    • Seafood Safety

      • Baseline Seafood Safety 2010
      • Baseline Seafood Safety 2005

      clear

    • Research Ships [Subsurface Monitoring]

      • Subsurface Monitoring Ship Locations 6-21-10 (Public)

      • Archived

        • Subsurface Monitoring Ship Locations 6-20-10

        clear

      clear

    clear

  • Fishery Closures [Resource Management]

    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 21-Jun-2010
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 16-Jun-10
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 07-Jun-10
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 05-Jun-10
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 04-Jun-10
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 02-JUN-10
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 01-JUN-10
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 31-MAY-10
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 28-May-2010
    • NMFS Emergency Fishery Closure 25-May-2010
    • LA Oyster Closure 12-Jun-10
    • LA Fishing Closure 17-Jun-10
    • FL Fishing Closure 13-Jun-2010

    clear

  • Wildlife Observations

    • NMFS Observations

      • NMFS Confirmed Sea Turtle Observations 21-Jun-2010
      • NMFS Confirmed Marine Mammal Strandings 21-Jun-2010

      clear

    clear

  clear

• Environmental Quality Baseline Data

  • Tissue Station Locations from NOAA Query Manager
  • NOAA Mussel Watch Stations
  • Sediment Station Locations from NOAA Query Manager

  clear

• Bioresources

  • Habitat Areas [Coastal Resources]

    • Bird

      • Seabird Nesting Colonies in Louisiana (CCEER)
      • Bird Habitat (FL) ESI
      • Bird Habitat (AL) ESI
      • Bird Habitat (MS) ESI
      • Bird Habitat (LA) ESI

      clear

    • Fish

      • Fish Habitat (FL) ESI
      • Fish Habitat (AL) ESI
      • Fish Habitat (MS) ESI
      • Fish Habitat (LA) ESI

      clear

    • Shellfish

      • Oyster Reefs (FL FWC)
      • Oysters 2009 (FL- FWC-FWRI)
      • Invertebrate Habitat (FL) ESI
      • Invertebrate Habitat (AL) ESI
      • Invertebrate Habitat (MS) ESI
      • Invertebrate Habitat (LA) ESI
      • Oyster Leases (LA) ESI

      clear

    • Marine Mammal

      • Marine Mammal Habitat (FL) ESI
      • Marine Mammal Habitat (AL) ESI
      • Marine Mammal Habitat (MS) ESI
      • Marine Mammals – Winter 2007 (SEFSC)
      • Marine Mammals – Spring 2007 (SEFSC)
      • Offshore Mammals – Feb. March 2007 (SEFSC)

      clear

    • Reptile

      • Reptile Habitat (AL) ESI
      • Reptile Habitat (MS) ESI
      • Reptile Habitat (LA) ESI
      • Reptile Habitat (FL) ESI
      • Turtles – Winter 2007 (SEFSC)
      • Turtles – Summer 2007 (SEFSC)

      clear

    • Terrestrial Mammal

      • Terrestrial Mammal Habitat (FL) ESI
      • Terrestrial Mammal Habitat (AL) ESI
      • Terrestrial Mammal Habitat (MS) ESI
      • Terrestrial Mammal Habitat (LA) ESI

      clear

    • Vegetation

      • Texas SAV (NPS)
      • Louisiana SAV (NPS)
      • Mississippi SAV (NPS)
      • Alabama SAV (NPS)
      • Florida SAV (NPS)
      • Florida Deep Seagrass Beds (NPS)
      • Vegetation (AL) ESI
      • Vegetation (FL) ESI
      • Vegetation (MS) ESI
      • Seagrass 1987-2007 (FL)
      • LA Coastal Marsh Types (LDWF)
      • Mangroves (FL) NWI

      clear

    • Benthic Habitat

      • NMFS Sediment & Habitat for Gulf of Mexico
      • Artificial Reefs
      • Deep-Sea Coral Database (NOAA)
      • Coral Habitats (USGS)
      • South Florida Benthic Habitats

      clear

    clear

  • Critical Habitat Areas

    • NOAA NMFS Critical Habitat

      • Acropora Coral
      • Gulf Sturgeon Units 1-7
      • Gulf Sturgeon Units 8-14
      • Smalltooth Sawfish

      clear

    • USFWS Critical Habitat

      • Alabama Beach Mouse
      • American Crocodile
      • Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow
      • Choctawhatchee Beach Mouse
      • Everglades Snail Kite
      • Gulf Sturgeon (Lines)
      • Gulf Sturgeon (Polygons)
      • Johnson’s Seagrass
      • Louisiana Black Bear
      • Perdido Key Beach Mouse
      • Piping Plover
      • Piping Plover (Texas addendum)
      • Rice Rat
      • Right Whale
      • St. Andrew Beach Mouse

      clear

    clear

  • Managed Areas

    • Classified Shellfish Growing/Harvest Areas (Gulf)
    • Essential Fish Habitat- Habitat Areas of Particular Concern
    • Indian Lands of the United States (National Atlas, 2005)
    • LA LOSCO Public Oyster Areas
    • MMS Designated Marine Protected Areas
    • FL DEP Aquatic Preserves 2008
    • MS Offshore Artificial Fishing Reefs
    • MS Oyster Harvesting Areas
    • NPS Historic Districts
    • MS Proposed Coastal Preserves
    • MS Shrimping Zones
    • MS Wildlife Management Areas
    • National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS)
    • National Marine Sanctuaries
    • NMFS Blue Fin Tuna Catches
    • NMFS Marsh Vegetative Type
    • Reef Fish Landing Data
    • US – Cuba Marine Boundary
    • USFWS National Wildlife Refuges: Special Designations
    • USFWS National Wildlife Refuges: Interest
    • USFWS Coastal Barrier Resources System
    • USFWS Landscape Conservation Cooperatives

    • Federal Fisheries Closed Areas (50 CFR Part 622.34)

      • Florida middle grounds HAPC
      • Reef fish longline and buoy gear restricted area
      • Tortugas marine reserves HAPC
      • Shrimp/stone crab separation zones
      • Southwest Florida seasonal trawl closure
      • Reef fish stressed area
      • Texas closure
      • Tortugas Shrimp sanctuary
      • West Flower Garden Bank HAPC
      • East Flower Garden Bank HAPC
      • Madison and Swanson sites
      • Steamboat Lumps
      • Closures of the Gulf shrimp fishery to reduce red snapper bycatch
      • Closures of the Gulf group king mackerel gillnet fishery
      • Pulley Ridge HAPC
      • Stetson Bank HAPC
      • McGrail Bank HAPC
      • Desoto Canyon (50 CFR Part 635.21)

      clear

    clear

  • Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) LA

    • ESI Index (LA)
    • Shoreline Classification (line) (LA)
    • Habitat Classification (poly) (LA)
    • Hydrological Classification (LA)
    • Parish Boundaries
    • Socioeconomic (point) (LA)
    • Shoreline Nests

    clear

  • Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) AL

    • ESI Index (AL)
    • Shoreline Classification (line) (AL)
    • Shoreline Classification (poly) (AL)
    • Breakwaters
    • Hydrological Classification (AL)
    • Management Areas (AL)
    • Socioeconomic (point) (AL)
    • Socioeconomic (line) (AL)

    clear

  • Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) MS

    • ESI Index (MS)
    • Shoreline Classification (line) (MS)
    • Shoreline Clasification (poly) (MS)
    • Hydrology line
    • Socioeconomic (line) (MS)
    • Management Areas (MS)
    • Nests
    • Socioeconomic (point) (MS)
    • Wetlands

    clear

  • Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) FL

    • ESI Index (FL)
    • Shoreline Classification (line) (FL)
    • Shoreline Classification (poly) (FL)
    • Hydrological Classification (FL)
    • Management Areas (FL)
    • Socioeconomic (point) (FL)
    • Socioeconomic (line) (FL)

    clear

  • Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) TX

    • Shoreline Classification (line) (TX)
    • Hydrological Classification
    • Hydrological line
    • Species

    clear

  clear

• Charts, Surveys, Ships

  • Marine Transport Caution Area
  • AIS Response Vessel Snapshot

  • NOAA Raster Nautical Charts

    • NOAA Region 8&17 – Auto Switching

    clear

  clear

• Data Buoys & Observations

  • National Data Buoy Center RSS Feed
  • Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit ACDP
  • NOAA CO-OPS Tide Prediction Stations
  • NOAA CO-OPS Water Levels

  clear

• Restoration

  • Restoration Sites – NMFS RCDB

  clear

• Current Weather

  • Analyses/ Nowcasts

    • NCOM Surface Water Currents w/SST
    • NCOM Surface Water Currents w/Speed
    • Surface Horizontal Current (m/s) (NWS-NCEP)
    • Sea Surface Temperature Analysis

    clear

  • NWS – WMS layers

    • Tornado/Severe Thunderstorm/Flash Flood/Special Marine Warnings
    • Marine Watches, Warnings and Advisories

    clear

  • Weather Radar Mosaic (NWS)
  • Surface Winds (Knots)
  • HF Radar 25 Hour Average (2010_06_21_2100)
  • Live IOOS HF Radar Stations

  clear

• Weather Forecasts

  • Wind

    • Surface Wind Velocity – 0hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity- 6hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 12hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 18hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 24hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 30hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 36hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 42hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 48hr forecast
    • Surface Wind Velocity – 72hr forecast

    clear

  • Wave

    • Sig Wave Height – 0hr Forecast
    • Sig Wave Height – 12hr Forecast
    • Sig Wave Height – 24hr Forecast
    • Sig Wave Height – 36hr Forecast
    • Sig Wave Height – 48hr Forecast

    clear

  • Precipitation

    • Quantitative Precipitation – 0 hr Forecast
    • Quantitative Precipitation – 12 hr Forecast
    • Quantitative Precipitation – 24 hr Forecast
    • Quantitative Precipitation – 36 hr Forecast
    • Quantitative Precipitation – 48 hr Forecast

    clear

  • Currents (NWS-NCEP)

    • Surface Horizontal Current (m/s) – 24hr forecast
    • Surface Horizontal Current (m/s) – 48hr forecast
    • Surface Horizontal Current (m/s) – 72hr forecast

    clear

  clear

• Sea Floor Maps [Bathymetry]

  • Sea Floor Bathymetric Contour
  • High Resolution Bathymetry Near Wellhead

  clear

• Public Safety/Infrastructure

  • Gulf of Mexico Shipping Fairways MMS

  clear

• Base

  • Boundaries

    • Interstate Boundaries
    • US Counties
    • Louisiana Parishes
    • Marine Jurisdictions

By analyzing bacterial communities in and on several people, scientists have begun to create an atlas of bacterial diversity that documents the different types of microbes that thrive in distinct regions of the human body. This research sets the stage for determining how changes in bacterial communities help to cause or prevent disease.

Our bodies play host to a wide variety of microbes, called the human microbiota, that outnumber our own cells by about 10 to 1. Many of these microbes help us stay healthy—for instance by aiding digestion or crowding out disease-causing microbes. But details about how microbial communities vary in different body regions, among people or over time are not yet well understood.

In a study funded in part by NIH’s National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Dr. Rob Knight and his colleagues at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and George Washington University, St. Louis, began to chart a baseline map of the human microbiota in healthy people. The results were published on November 5, 2009, in the advance online edition of Science.

The scientists surveyed bacterial communities in up to 27 different locations on the bodies of 9 healthy adults. Sampled regions included hair on the head, ear canals, nostrils, mouth, lower gut and 18 different skin sites ranging from foreheads and armpits to navels and feet. Swabs from these regions were collected 4 times over 3 months.

As in other recent studies of the human microbiota, Knight and colleagues identified bacteria by extracting DNA from each sample and then analyzing a bacteria-specific gene, called the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Overall, the detected microbes belong to 22 bacterial phyla. Four phyla were dominant, representing more than 90% of the identified bacteria.

The researchers found wide variability in bacterial communities on each person and between people. The greatest diversity over time was seen on hair, nostril and ear canal sites, as well as some skin regions, especially the forearms, palm, index finger, back of the knee and sole of the foot. These regions were also the most divergent between people, as was the lower gut. The mouth had the least bacterial variability of any tested region.

The researchers also tested how well bacteria from one body region could survive on another. They transferred bacteria from the tongue to the disinfected forearms and foreheads of some volunteers and tracked them for up to 8 hours. Tongue bacteria persisted longer on the forearms than foreheads, suggesting that the oily forehead may be too harsh a habitat for some bacteria. Bacterial communities transplanted from forehead to forearms and vice versa could not survive well in the new habitats, coming to resemble the native mix rather than the transplants within hours.

“This is the most complete view we have yet of the microbial side of ourselves, one that our group and others will be adding to over the coming years,” says Knight. “If we can better understand this variation, we may be able to begin searching for biomarkers for disease.”

—by Vicki Contie

Reference:
National Institutes of Health (November 16, 2009) Wide variety of bacteria mapped across the human body.  Retrieved November 16, 2009 from http://www.nih.gov/researchmatters/november2009/11162009bacteria.htm

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203-1738, USA. wei.zheng@vanderbilt.edu

PMID: 19838915 [PubMed - in process]

1.  
   • arsenic (a heavy metal toxin)
   • benzene (a chemical found in gasoline)
   • beryllium (a toxic metal)
   • cadmium (a metal used in batteries)
   • chromium (a metallic element)
   • ethylene oxide (a chemical used to sterilize medical devices)
   • nickel (a metallic element)
   • polonium–210 (a chemical element that gives off radiation)
   • vinyl chloride (a toxic substance used in plastics manufacture)
2. What is secondhand smoke?
3. How is secondhand smoke exposure measured?
4. Does secondhand smoke contain harmful chemicals?
5. Does exposure to secondhand smoke cause cancer?
6. What are the other health effects of exposure to secondhand smoke?
7. What is a safe level of secondhand smoke?
8. What is being done to reduce nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke?

Secondhand smoke (also called environmental tobacco smoke) is the combination of sidestream smoke (the smoke given off by the burning end of a tobacco product) and mainstream smoke (the smoke exhaled by the smoker) (1, 2, 3, 4). Exposure to secondhand smoke is also called involuntary smoking or passive smoking. People are exposed to secondhand smoke in homes, cars, the workplace, and public places such as bars, restaurants, and other recreation settings. In the United States, the source of most secondhand smoke is from cigarettes, followed by pipes, cigars, and other tobacco products (4).

 Secondhand smoke is measured by testing indoor air for nicotine or other smoke constituents. Exposure to secondhand smoke can be tested by measuring the levels of cotinine (a nicotine by-product in the body) in the nonsmoker’s blood, saliva, or urine (1). Nicotine, cotinine, carbon monoxide, and other evidence of secondhand smoke exposure have been found in the body fluids of nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke.

Yes. Of the more than 4,000 chemicals that have been identified in secondhand tobacco smoke, at least 250 are known to be harmful, and 50 of these are known to cause cancer. These chemicals include (1):

Many factors affect which chemicals are found in secondhand smoke, including the type of tobacco, the chemicals added to the tobacco, the way the product is smoked, and the paper in which the tobacco is wrapped (1, 3, 4).

 

Yes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), the U.S. Surgeon General, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have classified secondhand smoke as a known human carcinogen (cancer-causing agent) (1, 3, 5).

Inhaling secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in nonsmoking adults (4). Approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths occur each year among adult nonsmokers in the United States as a result of exposure to secondhand smoke (2). The Surgeon General estimates that living with a smoker increases a nonsmoker’s chances of developing lung cancer by 20 to 30 percent (4).

Some research suggests that secondhand smoke may increase the risk of breast cancer, nasal sinus cavity cancer, and nasopharyngeal cancer in adults, and leukemia, lymphoma, and brain tumors in children (4). Additional research is needed to learn whether a link exists between secondhand smoke exposure and these cancers.

Secondhand smoke causes disease and premature death in nonsmoking adults and children (4). Exposure to secondhand smoke irritates the airways and has immediate harmful effects on a person’s heart and blood vessels. It may increase the risk of heart disease by an estimated 25 to 30 percent (4). In the United States, secondhand smoke is thought to cause about 46,000 heart disease deaths each year (6). There may also be a link between exposure to secondhand smoke and the risk of stroke and hardening of the arteries; however, additional research is needed to confirm this link.

Children exposed to secondhand smoke are at an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), ear infections, colds, pneumonia, bronchitis, and more severe asthma. Being exposed to secondhand smoke slows the growth of children’s lungs and can cause them to cough, wheeze, and feel breathless (4).

There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Studies have shown that even low levels of secondhand smoke exposure can be harmful. The only way to fully protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke exposure is to completely eliminate smoking in indoor spaces. Separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning the air, and ventilating buildings cannot completely eliminate secondhand smoke exposure (4).

Many state and local governments have passed laws prohibiting smoking in public facilities such as schools, hospitals, airports, and bus terminals. Increasingly, state and local governments are also requiring private workplaces, including restaurants and bars, to be smoke free. To highlight the significant risk from secondhand smoke exposure, the National Cancer Institute, a component of the National Institutes of Health, holds meetings and conferences in states, counties, cities, or towns that are smoke free, unless certain circumstances justify an exception to this policy.

More information about state-level tobacco regulations is available through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System Web site. The STATE System is a database containing up-to-date and historical state-level data on tobacco use prevention and control. This resource is available at http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/ on the Internet.

On the national level, several laws restricting smoking in public places have been passed. Federal law bans smoking on domestic airline flights, nearly all flights between the United States and foreign destinations, interstate buses, and most trains. Smoking is also banned in most Federally owned buildings. The Pro-Children Act of 1994 prohibits smoking in facilities that routinely provide Federally funded services to children.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Healthy People 2010, a comprehensive, nationwide health promotion and disease prevention agenda, includes the goal of reducing the proportion of nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke from 65 percent to 45 percent by 2010 (7). More information about this program is available on the Healthy People 2010 Web site at http://www.healthypeople.gov/ on the Internet.

Internationally, several nations, including France, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, and Uruguay, require all workplaces, including bars and restaurants, to be smoke free.

Selected References

1. National Toxicology Program. Report on Carcinogens. Eleventh Edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, 2005. 
2. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Progress Report 2003. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2004. 
3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. Lyon, France: 2002. 
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006. 
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking (Also Known as Exposure to Secondhand Smoke or Environmental Tobacco Smoke–ETS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. 
6. California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant: Part B Health Effects, 2005. 
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000. 

Related NCI materials and Web pages:

• National Cancer Institute Fact Sheet 10.16, Questions and Answers About Cigar Smoking and Cancer
  (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/cigars)
• National Cancer Institute Fact Sheet 10.19, Quitting Smoking: Why To Quit and How To Get Help
  (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/cessation)
• Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 10: Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke
  (http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/10/index.html)
• NCI’s Smoking and Cancer Home Page
  (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/smoking)

For more help, contact:

NCI’s Cancer Information Service
Telephone (toll-free): 1–800–4–CANCER (1–800–422–6237)
TTY (toll-free): 1–800–332–8615
LiveHelp^® online chat: https://cissecure.nci.nih.gov/livehelp/welcome.asp

Reference:

National Cancer Institute (2009). Secondhand smoke questions and answers.  Retrieved November 2, 2009 from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/ETS

The U.S. Surgeon General concluded back in 2006 that nearly 50,000 Americans die each year from secondhand smoke exposure. The findings of this new IOM report are significant, because they confirm that secondhand smoke exposure is a significant cause of acute coronary events, including heart attacks, and that there is no safe level of exposure. 

The report also concluded that relatively brief exposure to secondhand smoke can cause acute coronary events. It has already been shown that secondhand smoke also causes other serious diseases, including lung cancer.

This growing mountain of evidence makes it clear that secondhand smoke kills, and to protect the public health, smoking should be prohibited in all public areas and workplaces. The Lung Association’s Smokefree Air Challenge is dedicated to making this happen. 

To date, half of all states, along with the District of Columbia, have met our Smokefree Air Challenge by implementing comprehensive smokefree laws.  These laws protect all workers from toxic secondhand smoke in the workplace, and also protect customers from smoke in bars and restaurants, giving people with asthma and other lung diseases the freedom to dine and socialize wherever they choose.

Now with even more evidence of the dangers of secondhand smoke from this new report, it is time for the remaining 25 states to protect their citizens by meeting our Smokefree Air Challenge and joining the American Lung Association in our fight to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease.

To learn more about the American Lung Association’s Smokefree Air Challenge, please visit www.lungusa.org/smokefree.

Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke.  Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.

Secondhand smoke causes about 50,000 deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year, including approximately 3,400 from lung cancer and up to 69,600 from heart disease.

Secondhand smoke is esecially harmful to young children.  Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age.

In the United States, 25 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.  Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in their blood.

Reference:
American Lung Association (2009) Confirmed – secondhand smoke causes heart attacks.  Retrieved November 1, 2009 from http://www.lungusa.org/about-us/our-impact/top-stories/secondhand-smoke-heart-attacks.html

CHICAGO -  As the nation continues to debate health reform, the American Medical Association (AMA) continues to advocate for reforms that will make the health care system work better for America’s patients and physicians. A new full-page advertisement under the headline, “A Healthier Tomorrow Depends on What We Do Today,” will run Tuesday in the Wall Street Journal’s special report “Fixing Healthcare.”

“Through reform our health care system can be improved for America’s patients and the physicians who dedicate their lives to caring for them,” said AMA President J. James Rohack, MD. “This new ad reiterates the AMA’s role in the reform debate as an advocate for patients and physicians, and shows that we will continue to be actively engaged until meaningful health reform is a reality.”

This ad is another piece of the AMA’s campaign to make health reform a reality. To view all AMA activity related to health reform, visit www.hsreform.org.

# # #

Media contact:

Lisa Lecas
American Medical Association
(312) 464-5980

People with mutant forms of the gene that causes the rare disorder Gaucher disease are 5 times more likely to develop Parkinson’s disease than the general public, according to a new study. The finding may lead to new insights into developing novel therapeutic strategies for these disorders.

Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects about 1.5 million Americans. The likelihood of developing the disorder increases with age and involves a combination of environmental risk factors and genetic susceptibility.

Earlier research by scientists at NIH’s National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and elsewhere found evidence that people with alterations in the GBA gene, which is responsible for Gaucher disease, may also be at increased risk for Parkinson’s disease. But the studies weren’t large enough to make a definitive link.

Gaucher disease arises when people inherit 2 defective copies of the GBA gene, which codes for the enzyme glucocerebrosidase. When defective, the enzyme can’t perform its normal duty of breaking down fatty molecules for disposal. The fatty molecules build up and engorge cells. Ultimately, this buildup can damage the spleen, liver, lungs, bone marrow and, in some cases, the brain.

To clarify the relationship between GBA and Parkinson’s disease, scientists from 16 research centers around the world pooled their genetic data on 5,691 Parkinson’s patients. The group included 780 Ashkenazi Jews, a population in which a particular type of Gaucher disease is more prevalent. These data were matched against a control group of 4,898 unaffected volunteers, including 387 Ashkenazi Jews. The study was supported in part by NHGRI and several other NIH components.

In the October 22, 2009, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, the scientists reported that more than 3% of the Parkinson’s patients—but only 0.6% of controls—had at least 1 of 2 common GBA alterations. Among Ashkenazi subjects, 15.3% of those with Parkinson’s disease carried one of these GBA alterations compared to 3.4% of controls.

In addition to screening for the 2 common alterations, the entire GBA gene was sequenced in a subset of non-Ashkenazi volunteers—1,883 with Parkinson’s disease and 1,611 controls. This more thorough analysis linked several more mutations to Parkinson’s disease. Overall, 7% of the Parkinson’s patients were found to have the GBA alterations. Those Parkinson’s patients with the GBA alterations also had an earlier disease onset.

“This analysis illustrates how studying a rare but important disorder, like Gaucher disease, can provide powerful clues about more common disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease,” said NHGRI Scientific Director Dr. Eric Green. “Understanding the genetic basis of rare conditions can thus provide insights into normal cellular and biological processes, which in turn may lead to improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.”

These mutations are among the most significant risk factors found to date for Parkinson’s disease. However, many GBA mutation carriers, as well as patients with Gaucher disease, never develop Parkinson’s disease. Other risk factors are clearly involved in the development of the disease.

Reference:
National Institutes of Science (October 26, 2009) Rare disease gene linked to Parkinson’s disease.  Retrieved October 26, 2009 from http://www.nih.gov/researchmatters/october2009/10262009parkinsons.htm

October is National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. As the federal government’s leading funder of breast cancer research, the National Cancer Institute supports a wide range of research to improve prevention, detection, and treatment of breast cancer. NCI also funds research on follow-up care for the growing number of breast cancer survivors. Take a look at some recent advances and selected resources, including a video.

On this page

Understand Your Risk

• Understanding  Breast Changes discusses common breast changes at various times of  life, types of follow-up testing, and types of biopsies. It helps women understand their screening results and emphasizes that not all breast changes mean cancer.
• Estimating Breast Cancer Risk describes the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool, an online tool developed by NCI and others to help health care providers estimate a woman’s individual risk of breast cancer.
• The Breast Cancer Prevention Summary (PDQ®) provides an overview of factors that may raise or lower your risk of breast cancer. There is also information about clinical trials that study ways to lower the risk of developing breast cancer.
  • See a list of U.S. breast cancer prevention clinical trials that are open to new participants.
• Both men and women who have certain mutations in their BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have an increased risk of breast cancer. See BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing.

Steps Toward Better Detection and Treatment

Screening and Detection

• Women should get a mammogram every one to two years beginning at age 40 to check for breast changes.
  • See the NCI Fact Sheet about mammograms.
  • For an overview of tests commonly used to screen for breast cancer, see the Breast Cancer Screening (PDQ®) summary.
• Improving mammography is the goal of the NCI-supported Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC), which gathers and pools data from around the country into a centralized database on women undergoing mammography.
  • See Improving Mammography Quality, Expanding Screening Research in the NCI Cancer Bulletin.
• See a list of U.S. breast cancer screening and detection clinical trials open to new participants.

Treatment

• The Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ®) summary provides an overview of current standard treatment options.
  • See a list of U.S. breast cancer treatment clinical trials open to new participants.
• The NCI factsheet Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer explains side effects, risks, and benefits of two different types of breast cancer therapy.  Adjuvant therapy is treatment given after primary therapy to increase the chance of long-term survival. Neoadjuvant therapy is treatment given before primary therapy.
• Weekly Paclitaxel Improves Breast Cancer Survival summarizes the results of a randomized clinical trial showing that weekly doses of the drug paclitaxel (Taxol®) after surgery and standard chemotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival in women with breast cancer.

• “Targeted Therapies for Breast Cancer” is an animated tutorial focusing on targeted therapies that have been and are being developed to treat breast cancer. It describes important molecular pathways in breast cancer cells and discusses new therapeutic agents, including small molecules and monoclonal antibodies that target these pathways.
  • Animated/Flash Version (Flash – 15.00 min.)
  • HTML/Accessible Version (For low-bandwidth connections)

Life after Breast Cancer

• Lymphedema, a condition in which lymph fluid builds up in damaged soft body tissues and causes swelling, can be a painful side effect of breast cancer treatment.
  • For information about this condition, see the Lymphedema (PDQ®) summary.

• Slowly progressive weight lifting did not aggravate limb swelling among breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, according to a randomized clinical trial (see the story).
• Cognitive changes associated with chemotherapy for breast cancer and other kinds of cancer may, in about 20 percent of survivors, persist after treatment has ended. See Delving into Possible Mechanisms for Chemobrain in the NCI Cancer Bulletin.
• Other NCI resources related to cancer survivorship include
  • Follow-Up Care After Cancer Treatment
  • Facing Forward: Life After Cancer Treatment
  • NCI’s Office of Cancer Survivorship

General Breast Cancer Information

• The Breast Cancer Home Page is NCI’s gateway Web page to information about breast cancer.
• What You Need To Know About™ Breast Cancer is a patient education booklet about the disease.
• A Snapshot of Breast Cancer provides key information about  disease incidence and mortality, NCI funding trends, relevant research activities, and recent scientific advances.