Diane-Michel.com

Facilitating breakthrough medical research through collaborative intelligence, and the Semantic Web.
  • rss
  • Home
  • Diane Michel’s Blog
  • Stand Up to Cancer

Well-done meat intake, heterocyclic amine exposure, and cancer risk.

Diane | November 17, 2009

Zheng W, Lee SA.

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203-1738, USA. wei.zheng@vanderbilt.edu

High intake of meat, particularly red and processed meat, has been associated with an increased risk of a number of common cancers such as breast, colorectum, and prostate in many epidemiological studies. Heterocyclic amines (HCAs) are a group of mutagenic compounds found in cooked meats, particularly well-done meats. HCAs are some of most potent mutagens detected using the Ames/salmonella tests and have been clearly shown to induce tumors in experimental animal models. Over the past 10 years, an increasing number of epidemiological studies have evaluated the association of well-done meat intake and meat carcinogen exposure with cancer risk. The results from these epidemiologic studies were evaluated and summarized in this review. The majority of these studies have shown that high intake of well-done meat and high exposure to meat carcinogens, particularly HCAs, may increase the risk of human cancer.

PMID: 19838915 [PubMed - in process]

Comments
No Comments »
Categories
Cancer Research
Tags
cancer, cancers, Carcinogens, Cooking, Health/Medical/Pharmaceuticals, Heterocyclic amines, Meat, Mutagen, Nashville, OAO, Oncology, Prostate cancer, Tennessee, tumors, United States, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, wei.zheng@vanderbilt.edu
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Secondhand Smoke: Questions and Answers

Diane | November 2, 2009

Resource:  National Cancer Institute

 

Key Points

  • Secondhand smoke (also called environmental tobacco smoke) is the combination of smoke given off by the burning end of a tobacco product and the smoke exhaled by the smoker (see Question 1).
  • Of the chemicals identified in secondhand smoke, more than 50 have been found to cause cancer (see Question 3).
  • Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in nonsmokers (see Question 4).
  • Secondhand smoke causes heart disease in adults and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), ear infections, and asthma attacks in children (see Question 5).
  • There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke (see Question 6).
  1.  
    • arsenic (a heavy metal toxin)
    • benzene (a chemical found in gasoline)
    • beryllium (a toxic metal)
    • cadmium (a metal used in batteries)
    • chromium (a metallic element)
    • ethylene oxide (a chemical used to sterilize medical devices)
    • nickel (a metallic element)
    • polonium–210 (a chemical element that gives off radiation)
    • vinyl chloride (a toxic substance used in plastics manufacture)
  2. What is secondhand smoke?
  3. How is secondhand smoke exposure measured?
  4. Does secondhand smoke contain harmful chemicals?
  5. Does exposure to secondhand smoke cause cancer?
  6. What are the other health effects of exposure to secondhand smoke?
  7. What is a safe level of secondhand smoke?
  8. What is being done to reduce nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke?
  9. Secondhand smoke (also called environmental tobacco smoke) is the combination of sidestream smoke (the smoke given off by the burning end of a tobacco product) and mainstream smoke (the smoke exhaled by the smoker) (1, 2, 3, 4). Exposure to secondhand smoke is also called involuntary smoking or passive smoking. People are exposed to secondhand smoke in homes, cars, the workplace, and public places such as bars, restaurants, and other recreation settings. In the United States, the source of most secondhand smoke is from cigarettes, followed by pipes, cigars, and other tobacco products (4).

     Secondhand smoke is measured by testing indoor air for nicotine or other smoke constituents. Exposure to secondhand smoke can be tested by measuring the levels of cotinine (a nicotine by-product in the body) in the nonsmoker’s blood, saliva, or urine (1). Nicotine, cotinine, carbon monoxide, and other evidence of secondhand smoke exposure have been found in the body fluids of nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke.

    Yes. Of the more than 4,000 chemicals that have been identified in secondhand tobacco smoke, at least 250 are known to be harmful, and 50 of these are known to cause cancer. These chemicals include (1):

    Many factors affect which chemicals are found in secondhand smoke, including the type of tobacco, the chemicals added to the tobacco, the way the product is smoked, and the paper in which the tobacco is wrapped (1, 3, 4).

     

    Yes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), the U.S. Surgeon General, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have classified secondhand smoke as a known human carcinogen (cancer-causing agent) (1, 3, 5).

    Inhaling secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in nonsmoking adults (4). Approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths occur each year among adult nonsmokers in the United States as a result of exposure to secondhand smoke (2). The Surgeon General estimates that living with a smoker increases a nonsmoker’s chances of developing lung cancer by 20 to 30 percent (4).

    Some research suggests that secondhand smoke may increase the risk of breast cancer, nasal sinus cavity cancer, and nasopharyngeal cancer in adults, and leukemia, lymphoma, and brain tumors in children (4). Additional research is needed to learn whether a link exists between secondhand smoke exposure and these cancers.

    Secondhand smoke causes disease and premature death in nonsmoking adults and children (4). Exposure to secondhand smoke irritates the airways and has immediate harmful effects on a person’s heart and blood vessels. It may increase the risk of heart disease by an estimated 25 to 30 percent (4). In the United States, secondhand smoke is thought to cause about 46,000 heart disease deaths each year (6). There may also be a link between exposure to secondhand smoke and the risk of stroke and hardening of the arteries; however, additional research is needed to confirm this link.

    Children exposed to secondhand smoke are at an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), ear infections, colds, pneumonia, bronchitis, and more severe asthma. Being exposed to secondhand smoke slows the growth of children’s lungs and can cause them to cough, wheeze, and feel breathless (4).

    There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Studies have shown that even low levels of secondhand smoke exposure can be harmful. The only way to fully protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke exposure is to completely eliminate smoking in indoor spaces. Separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning the air, and ventilating buildings cannot completely eliminate secondhand smoke exposure (4).

    Many state and local governments have passed laws prohibiting smoking in public facilities such as schools, hospitals, airports, and bus terminals. Increasingly, state and local governments are also requiring private workplaces, including restaurants and bars, to be smoke free. To highlight the significant risk from secondhand smoke exposure, the National Cancer Institute, a component of the National Institutes of Health, holds meetings and conferences in states, counties, cities, or towns that are smoke free, unless certain circumstances justify an exception to this policy.

    More information about state-level tobacco regulations is available through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System Web site. The STATE System is a database containing up-to-date and historical state-level data on tobacco use prevention and control. This resource is available at http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/ on the Internet.

    On the national level, several laws restricting smoking in public places have been passed. Federal law bans smoking on domestic airline flights, nearly all flights between the United States and foreign destinations, interstate buses, and most trains. Smoking is also banned in most Federally owned buildings. The Pro-Children Act of 1994 prohibits smoking in facilities that routinely provide Federally funded services to children.

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Healthy People 2010, a comprehensive, nationwide health promotion and disease prevention agenda, includes the goal of reducing the proportion of nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke from 65 percent to 45 percent by 2010 (7). More information about this program is available on the Healthy People 2010 Web site at http://www.healthypeople.gov/ on the Internet.

    Internationally, several nations, including France, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, and Uruguay, require all workplaces, including bars and restaurants, to be smoke free.

 

Selected References

  1. National Toxicology Program. Report on Carcinogens. Eleventh Edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, 2005. 
  2. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Progress Report 2003. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2004. 
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. Lyon, France: 2002. 
  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006. 
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking (Also Known as Exposure to Secondhand Smoke or Environmental Tobacco Smoke–ETS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. 
  6. California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant: Part B Health Effects, 2005. 
  7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000. 

 

### 

Related NCI materials and Web pages:

  • National Cancer Institute Fact Sheet 10.16, Questions and Answers About Cigar Smoking and Cancer
    (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/cigars)
  • National Cancer Institute Fact Sheet 10.19, Quitting Smoking: Why To Quit and How To Get Help
    (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/cessation)
  • Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 10: Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke
    (http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/10/index.html)
  • NCI’s Smoking and Cancer Home Page
    (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/smoking)

 

For more help, contact:

NCI’s Cancer Information Service
Telephone (toll-free): 1–800–4–CANCER (1–800–422–6237)
TTY (toll-free): 1–800–332–8615
LiveHelp® online chat: https://cissecure.nci.nih.gov/livehelp/welcome.asp
Reference:

National Cancer Institute (2009). Secondhand smoke questions and answers.  Retrieved November 2, 2009 from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/ETS

Comments
1 Comment »
Categories
Cancer Research, Second Hand Smoke
Tags
airline flights, asthma, brain tumors, breast cancer, Bronchitis, cancer, cancers, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, chemicals, Cigar, cough, ear infections, Federal law, France, Health/Medical/Pharmaceuticals, Heart Disease, International Agency for Research, Ireland, leukemia, Lung cancer, lymphoma, nasopharyngeal cancer, National Cancer Institute, New Zealand, Nicotine, nicotine by-product, Norway, Passive smoking, pneumonia, SIDS, Smoking, Sudden infant death syndrome, Surgeon General, Tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco products, Tobacco smoking, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Surgeon General, United States, Uruguay
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Confirmed – Secondhand Smoke Causes Heart Attacks

Diane |
Resource:  American Lung AssociationA new Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Cardiovascular Effects: Making Sense of the Evidence, has confirmed that exposure to secondhand smoke is a significant cause of heart attacks among nonsmokers.  This report underscores the urgency of the American Lung Association’s Smokefree Air Challenge, a nationwide campaign to eliminate exposure to secondhand smoke in all work and public places.

The U.S. Surgeon General concluded back in 2006 that nearly 50,000 Americans die each year from secondhand smoke exposure. The findings of this new IOM report are significant, because they confirm that secondhand smoke exposure is a significant cause of acute coronary events, including heart attacks, and that there is no safe level of exposure. 

The report also concluded that relatively brief exposure to secondhand smoke can cause acute coronary events. It has already been shown that secondhand smoke also causes other serious diseases, including lung cancer.

This growing mountain of evidence makes it clear that secondhand smoke kills, and to protect the public health, smoking should be prohibited in all public areas and workplaces. The Lung Association’s Smokefree Air Challenge is dedicated to making this happen. 

To date, half of all states, along with the District of Columbia, have met our Smokefree Air Challenge by implementing comprehensive smokefree laws.  These laws protect all workers from toxic secondhand smoke in the workplace, and also protect customers from smoke in bars and restaurants, giving people with asthma and other lung diseases the freedom to dine and socialize wherever they choose.

Now with even more evidence of the dangers of secondhand smoke from this new report, it is time for the remaining 25 states to protect their citizens by meeting our Smokefree Air Challenge and joining the American Lung Association in our fight to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease.

To learn more about the American Lung Association’s Smokefree Air Challenge, please visit www.lungusa.org/smokefree.

Facts about Secondhand Smoke

Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke.  Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.

Secondhand smoke causes about 50,000 deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year, including approximately 3,400 from lung cancer and up to 69,600 from heart disease.

Secondhand smoke is esecially harmful to young children.  Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age.

In the United States, 25 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.  Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in their blood.

Reference:
American Lung Association (2009) Confirmed – secondhand smoke causes heart attacks.  Retrieved November 1, 2009 from http://www.lungusa.org/about-us/our-impact/top-stories/secondhand-smoke-heart-attacks.html

 

Comments
No Comments »
Categories
Cancer Research, Heart Disease, Secondhand smoke
Tags
American Lung Association, asthma, breakdown product, chemicals, Cigarettes, District of Columbia, Environment, Health/Medical/Pharmaceuticals, heart attacks, Heart Disease, Institute of Medicine, Lung cancer, Lung Disease, Lung diseases, Nicotine, Passive smoking, respiratory tract infections, Smoke, Smoking, Tobacco, U.S. Surgeon General, United States
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Genome Screen Reveals Two-Way Communication Between Common Biological Pathways and Body’s Daily Clock

Diane | October 9, 2009
September 17, 2009

News Release
Insulin, folate metabolism influence circadian rhythms, according to Penn studyPHILADELPHIA – While scientists have known for several years that our body’s internal clock helps regulate many biological processes, researchers have found that the reverse is also true: Many common biological processes – including insulin metabolism – regulate the clock, according to a new study by investigators at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, and the University of California at San Diego.
Related Image

  • The Expanded Clock Gene Network. (Click to view larger version.)

Related Links

  • BioGPS Database
  • BioGPS Circadian Gene Data
  • A Biological Basis for the 8-Hour Workday?
  • Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics
  • University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
  • University of Pennsylvania Health System

The new data, published online in Cell this week, suggest that someday physicians may be able to use small molecules that inhibit or stimulate these biological processes in order to influence a person’s clock when it gets out of sync due to jetlag or shift work. Researchers may also be able to find new ways to treat metabolic disorders that are intimately tied to the body’s daily cycles.

Using a genome-wide screen, the investigators found that reducing expression of any one of hundreds of genes could substantially alter the length of the circadian cycle, which controls the 24-hour sleep/wake cycle. The clock-influencing genes are involved in a large number of biological processes, but the researchers found that components of insulin metabolism, folate metabolism, and the cell cycle were overrepresented in the gene screen, suggesting that these pathways are closely linked to the clock.

“Clock biologists all appreciated that the communication went one direction – from the clock to biological processes – but I don’t think anyone anticipated that there would be this level of integration with cell metabolism and the cell cycle, or all these other pathways impinging on clock function,” says John Hogenesch, PhD, Associate Professor of Pharmacology in the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics at Penn. Hogenesch is a co-senior author on the paper with Steve Kay, Dean of the Division of Biological Sciences at UCSD. “There were some hints this might occur for some genes, but not to this extent.”

The idea that biological processes might have feedback systems with the circadian clock makes some sense to Hogenesch. For example, he points to the influence of insulin metabolism, saying “If your energy requirements aren’t being met, instead of spending a lot of energy on a cell division, a cell might necessarily delay it. It is the same strategy we use when we are not ready to do something, we delay. Maybe procrastination is an evolutionary cellular strategy enabled by the clock to confront situations where resources are limited.”

While biologists regularly draw molecular pathways as if they are distinct from one another, they know the reality is much different. “This is a good example showing how dozens of pathways are functionally interconnected with clock function and vice versa,” Hogenesch says. “It is important to remember that when you start to change function with a drug, for example, that the perturbation can have unanticipated consequence. Sometimes these consequences are good, but sometimes not.”

Hogenesch stresses that while the new experiments show a feedback loop between biological processes and the clock in individual cells in culture, it is not yet clear how feedback systems work in the whole organism. Currently the team is working on biochemical and genetic experiments to answer that question.

In addition to publishing the data in the journal, the investigators have displayed the data on the BioGPS open-access searchable database (http://biogps.gnf.org). The circadian genome-wide screen data can be found at http://biogps.gnf.org/circadian/ and are linked to expression data from Penn, gene function data at Wikipedia and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), as well as gene structure information from the University of California at Santa Cruz.

Hogenesch, who helped develop the website when he worked at the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation in San Diego, said the site relies on web 2.0 technology and is very simple to use and customize. He and his colleagues built the site because many researchers want to do large database searches but are not computer scientists or informatics specialists. “Andy Su [of Novartis] and I decided to develop a site that even my mom could use, and pitched at the 90 percent of biologists who want to use something but don’t have the skill sets. We decided to build something that would allow them to take advantage of large datasets such as this one.”

Co-first authors on the paper are Eric E. Zhang and Tsuyoshi Hirota of the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, and UCSD, and Andrew C. Liu, of the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation and the University of Memphis, Tenn. Other authors on the paper include Loren J. Miraglia, Genevieve Welch, Xianzhong Liu, Jon W. Huss III, Jeff Janes, and Andrew I. Su of the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, and Pagkapol Y. Pongsawakul, Ann Atwood, and Steve A. Kay of UCSD.

This research was funded by Silvio O. Conte Center and the National Institute of Mental Health. 

###

PENN Medicine is a $3.6 billion enterprise dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and excellence in patient care. PENN Medicine consists of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (founded in 1765 as the nation’s first medical school) and the University of Pennsylvania Health System.

Penn’s School of Medicine is currently ranked #3 in the nation in U.S.News & World Report’s survey of top research-oriented medical schools; and, according to the National Institutes of Health, received over $366 million in NIH grants (excluding contracts) in the 2008 fiscal year. Supporting 1,700 fulltime faculty and 700 students, the School of Medicine is recognized worldwide for its superior education and training of the next generation of physician-scientists and leaders of academic medicine.

The University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) includes its flagship hospital, the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, rated one of the nation’s top ten “Honor Roll” hospitals by U.S.News & World Report; Pennsylvania Hospital, the nation’s first hospital; and Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, named one of the nation’s “100 Top Hospitals” for cardiovascular care by Thomson Reuters. In addition UPHS includes a primary-care provider network; a faculty practice plan; home care, hospice, and nursing home; three multispecialty satellite facilities; as well as the Penn Medicine at Rittenhouse campus, which offers comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation facilities and outpatient services in multiple specialties.

Comments
No Comments »
Categories
Uncategorized
Tags
2.0 technology, Andrew C. Liu, Andrew I. Su, Andy Su, Ann Atwood, Associate Professor, author, Biologist, Biotechnology, California, Circadian rhythms, Dean, Division of Biological Sciences, Division of Biological Sciences at UCSD, energy, energy requirements, Eric E. Zhang, feedback systems, Genevieve Welch, Genomics, Genomics Institute, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, Health/Medical/Pharmaceuticals, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Jeff Janes, John Hogenesch, Jon W. Huss III, Loren J. Miraglia, metabolic disorders, multispecialty satellite facilities, National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institute of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Novartis, Novartis AG, Novartis Research Foundation, outpatient services, Pagkapol Y. Pongsawakul, Penn Medicine, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Presbyterian Medical Center, Professor of Pharmacology, Rittenhouse campus, San Diego, Santa Cruz, Silvio O. Conte Center, Sleep, Steve A. Kay, Steve Kay, Tennessee, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Thomson Reuters Group Ltd, Tsuyoshi Hirota, U.S.News & World Report, UCSD, United States, University of California at San Diego, University of Memphis, University of Pennsylvania Health System, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, USD, Xianzhong Liu
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells

Diane | March 15, 2009

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________
For Immediate Release       March 9, 2009

EXECUTIVE ORDER

- – - – - – -

REMOVING BARRIERS TO RESPONSIBLE SCIENTIFIC
RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN STEM CELLS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Policy.  Research involving human embryonic stem cells and human non-embryonic stem cells has the potential to lead to better understanding and treatment of many disabling diseases and conditions.  Advances over the past decade in this promising scientific field have been encouraging, leading to broad agreement in the scientific community that the research should be supported by Federal funds.

For the past 8 years, the authority of the Department of Health and Human Services, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), to fund and conduct human embryonic stem cell research has been limited by Presidential actions.  The purpose of this order is to remove these limitations on scientific inquiry, to expand NIH support for the exploration of human stem cell research, and in so doing to enhance the contribution of America’s scientists to important new discoveries and new therapies for the benefit of humankind.

Sec. 2.  Research.  The Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary), through the Director of NIH, may support and conduct responsible, scientifically worthy human stem cell research, including human embryonic stem cell research, to the extent permitted by law.

Sec. 3.  Guidance.  Within 120 days from the date of this order, the Secretary, through the Director of NIH, shall review existing NIH guidance and other widely recognized guidelines on human stem cell research, including provisions establishing appropriate safeguards, and issue new NIH guidance on such research that is consistent with this order.  The Secretary, through NIH, shall review and update such guidance periodically, as appropriate.

Sec. 4.  General Provisions.  (a)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(b)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Sec. 5.  Revocations.  (a)  The Presidential statement of August 9, 2001, limiting Federal funding for research involving human embryonic stem cells, shall have no further effect as a statement of governmental policy.

(b)  Executive Order 13435 of June 20, 2007, which supplements the August 9, 2001, statement on human embryonic stem cell research, is revoked.
 

BARACK OBAMA
 

THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 9, 2009.

Comments
No Comments »
Categories
Obama Healthcare Initiatives, Stem Cell Research
Tags
America, BARACK OBAMA, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, Office of Management and Budget, Office of the Press, STEM CELLS, treatment of many disabling diseases, United States, United States of America, WHITE HOUSE
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Navigation

  • About Me
  • Breast Cancer
  • Brilliant Thinkers
  • Business
  • Cancer Research
  • Cardiovascular Health
  • Charter for Compassion
  • Collective Intelligence
  • Diabetes Research
  • Education
  • Education: Medical
  • Education: Technologies
  • Future Think
  • Global Health
  • Growing Cells
  • Health Care Reform
  • Healthcare Reform
  • Heart Disease
  • Information Design
  • Lung Disease
  • Medical Research
  • Medical Research Guidelines
  • Obama Healthcare Initiatives
  • Obama Healthcare Reform
  • Online Learning
  • Open Source Medical Information
  • Parkinsons
  • Rock Stars of Science
  • Second Hand Smoke
  • Second Life
  • Second Life Introduction
  • Second Life Medical Research
  • Secondhand smoke
  • Semantic search
  • Semantic Tutorial
  • Semantic Web
  • Semantic Web – Medical
  • Semantic Web Applications
  • Semantic Web Search Engines
  • SL: Medical Research
  • SL: Teacher's Resources
  • Stem Cell Research
  • TB – Tuberculosis
  • TED
  • Tim Berners-Lee
  • Uncategorized
  • Usability
  • Virtual Reality: Second Life
  • Web 2.0

Search

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox